• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

DigitalExits

We Sell Your Online Business

Blog

How To Sell an Amazon FBA Business

April 13, 2017 By jock

There is a specific process for selling your Amazon FBA business. Here it is:

What is Your Amazon FBA Business Worth?

In order to discover what your Amazon FBA business is worth you have to do at least two things: first, gather all financial information from the past years. Focus on the last three to five years, if possible. Then, compile it into a thorough and complete report. Your potential buyers will probably ask for finance data that justifies the investment they are planning to do.

As Amazon FBA businesses are a particularly popular business in the United States, as they are all over the world, competition can be a problem as well. Potential buyers are aware of that, for sure, so you must include in the same report how competition may be harming your business.

What are the sales?
How much is the profit?
What are the growth trends?
What is driving new sales and is that sustainable?
What channels do new customers come from and what is the breakdown of each channel?
What is your market position?
Is your location favorable?
How reliant is the business on the owner?
What systems and processes are in place to run the business?

What makes an Amazon FBA worth more?

There are some aspects that may improve your Amazon business valuation and make it worth even more. So it’s essential you don’t set your asking price before knowing exactly which characteristics from your business can be considered valuable.

Don’t get lost, check out these metrics:

    • Predictable key drivers of new sales
    • Stable or growing traffic from diversified sources
    • Established suppliers of inventory with backup suppliers in place
    • Traffic stats
    • High percentage of repeat visitors and repeat sales
    • Clean legal history
    • Brand with trademark, copyright or legal concerns
  •        Documented systems and processes
  •        Growth potential

Filed Under: Blog

From Mortar and Bricks to Cash and Clicks

August 27, 2015 By jock

E-commerce may seem like a retail staple to us, but for many people the legitimacy of online businesses never became apparent. The power of brick and mortar always sent a strong message to consumers that said “this is a real business.” But what’s keeping online businesses from getting the same message across?

In 2007, online retail stores amounted to $175 billion and are projected to grow to $370 billion by 2017. Multi-million dollar acquisitions are happening now more than ever and they just keep growing while storefront are cutting back to make way. Gap, RadioShack, and Staples all plan to close down hundreds of stores in the coming years, going the same way as Blockbuster (who turned down and offer to purchase Netflix for just $50 million in 2000).

The web is not always considered to be a viable “storefront,” if you will, but as more multi-million dollar businesses make their debut from a humble home office, we see that success doesn’t demand brick and mortar. This infographic gives the rundown for what is actually going on in the world of e-commerce and what we can expect for the future.

 

Digital-Exits

Embed Our Infographic On Your Site!

Filed Under: Blog

Ecommerce Accounting with Scott Scharf

June 15, 2015 By jock

“What get’s measured, get’s managed” coined by management theorist Peter Drucker. One of the most important things in running a business is knowing your numbers. We talk to Scott Scharf of Catching Clouds about that exact fact and the value of a great accountant.

Listen To The Full Interview:

[powerpress]

Subscribe to Podcast: Itunes 

On this week’s episode, we talk with Scott Scharf as he talks with us about the value of a good accountant for your ecommerce business. We discuss why a great accountant can not only save you money but also allow you to grow your business successfully.

What You’ll Learn From This Episode:

  • Ecommerce accounting best practices
  • How cloud inventory can help your ecommerce business
  • Why you might be liable for thousands in sales tax

Featured On The Show:

  • Catching Clouds

Transcription:

Jock: Jock here, and welcome back to another episode of the Digital Exits Podcast, In this episode, we’re going to be talking about what I believe is a topic and business process that most entrepreneurs inherently really are bad at, and that’s accounting, specifically, ecommerce accounting with Scott from CatchingClouds.net. Scott, how are you today?

Scott: I’m doing well. Thank you, Jock.

Jock: Excellent. So we connected via Shopify. You’re a prolific publisher of guest posts on topics around accounting and ecommerce. Do you want to start with sort of a quick background on the company and what you do for your clients?

Scott: Sounds great. Catching Clouds is a partnership between myself and my wife. She’s a CPA and accountant, and I’ve been in IT for 30+ years, focusing really on process, and spent most of my career working with small businesses, but also some time working for large multinationals. Catching Clouds, we provide outsourced accounting services for ecommerce businesses. So we understand not only the accounting and the cloud tools and specifically ecommerce tools like cloud inventory, sales tax, and others, but we actually have virtual bookkeepers that do bookkeeping for our clients on a daily basis so your books are up to date. As ecommerce businesses, the things that you look to outsource, that you probably don’t want to do are your shipping, if you’re still fulfilling all of your own products, definitely help on marketing, even though I know Jock will say, “Look, you’ve got to do a fair amount in order to be yourself and understand what’s going on,” that’s his space. And then the accounting, because most people don’t go into business to do the accounting, okay? They go into the business to make money, to do great things for their families, and then provide great products as well as help the local communities. And they probably enjoy the products or hobby or niche they’re in, or certain aspects of their business, but it’s typically not accounting. We really focus on making that a manageable process for ecommerce businesses, so that they have current, accurate, and actionable financial information so that they can make the right decisions, as well as look forward and know if they’re profitable or not, and how they’re doing as a business.

Jock: So we’ve had a previous discussion about when your services are required, and there’s a certain threshold that you need to be at as an ecommerce business before you should start really considering outsourcing your accounting. So do you want to sort of go through the growth stages of an ecommerce business, and then when you start to make sense for the company?

Scott: Absolutely. Really, for businesses, same thing if you’re starting your own business, you end up doing the work yourself for a while, and there are definitely different stages in an ecommerce business. But you definitely have to hit at least $1 million dollars and be a million-dollar business, so you’re looking at $60-70,000 per month of consistent revenue. Anything below that, you really need to be looking at your business and spending that money, a certain percentage, whether it’s 50-50, or 66% and 33% on both inventory and marketing your business, so people continue to come to your business. You want to find that balance. If you’re spending money on either outsourcing your accounting before that time, or spending it on outsourcing to a warehouse too soon, it can slow down your growth and it’s not necessarily the best strategy. So we really want to give our clients the best advice. Anybody below that point, we really try to point them at how to do it themselves until they can’t take it anymore. Now, if you have really high margins, or you see a good run rate, and you’re really ready to invest in that, and you understand that it’s going to cost you in sales that you’re either marketing to or the products you’re buying, we’re happy to talk to people, but that’s really the key threshold, and then really looking at the complexity of your business. We work with mostly multichannel sellers, selling on Amazon, eBay, one or multiple shopping carts that really have a lot going on in their business, and they need someone that can help pull all that data together so that the information makes it into their financials and they can understand how their business is doing.

Jock: We talked about your outsourcing accounting. However, there are other services that you provide that, I think, is a unique proposition to any ecommerce store out there. Do you want to sort of discuss that?

Scott: We, of course, do the accounting and we actually do the work. Really, ecommerce businesses end up with a couple key things that send us all the copies of all the documents of what’s going on in the business and you still have to pay your own bills. We want access to your data, not your money, so we’re going to keep that information. What we’re offering is not only the accounting and doing the day-to-day bookkeeping and the controller who will help you interpret your numbers and walk through them. And everything we do is fixed fee. This isn’t an hourly, variable thing. You understand the cost to your business each month. And the other key piece we provide, with my technical background, is all the cloud accounting tools. We set up the accounting. We migrate your existing data. We help set up the cloud inventory, and help find the best cloud inventory solution for you. If your business is either mostly drop-shipping, or you’re doing lots of B2B and wholesale, or you’re multichannel, or you’re multi-currency, and you’re selling in multiple marketplaces and regions around the world. There might be a different cloud inventory solution that’s best for your business. We help you find that solution and then we help implement it so these things are set up properly. They’re integrated together, where we’re pulling all the data that we need from the accounting perspective, but then we really focus in on helping optimize the process for our clients, whether it’s optimizing your purchase process, your inventory management process…and then, of course, knowing profitability per SKU and the other components. So it’s a combination of not only the accounting, and somebody that’s actually doing the accounting for you, and then we’ll explain that information back to you, but it’s the automated technology tools to connect that data in the cloud. As an ecommerce business, you’re already in the cloud, and we want to pull that data together and make it more visible to you and provide tools that you can see. The nice thing about zero.com, the cloud accounting platform that we use, you can log in 24/7 and see your books, and know every weekday, by noon each day, everything’s been updated so that you know that you have current information and you’re not just running your business off the balance in your business checking account

Jock: What’s the biggest problem that your customers have when they initially come to you?

Scott: They don’t know if they’re profitable or not. They…they’re not quite sure and there’s a big difference between the cash in the bank and whether your business is profitable or not. They just don’t know where they stand, and so there’s a lot of stress related to not knowing. Think how stressed you’d be if someone told you that you had five minutes, and then you were going on Shark Tank, in front of the Shark Tank hosts, and you have to rattle off your customer acquisition costs, your profitability per SKU, what your revenue is, what your average margins are. And if you don’t know those things, you need know those inherently so you can sleep better at night. That’s really the main thing. And then, the time they lose, not just stress, spending time doing accounting, vs. focusing on sales or social media and driving more business to their business, or getting better deals on products they’re purchasing.

Jock: You talked about some key metrics there – customer acquisition costs, customer lifetime value, etc. Part of the accounting process is you calculate those things?

Scott: We pull different data together. So from the accounting perspective, we’re going to pull together and tell you if you’re profitable as a business. We’ll keep track of your sales tax liability so you know if you have $5,000 of sales tax that’s not yours. We’ll show profitability per channel – Amazon margins vs. Big Commerce or Shopify or other pieces. Then when we’re implementing different cloud inventory tools, we will focus on what your key metrics are and help implement the right tool. So cloud inventory is going to show you your profitability per SKU. The good ones will show you the velocity at which products…which products aren’t selling or selling slower. When you’re looking at your customer acquisition costs, and some of those other lifetime value components, then you need to adapt those and make sure that you are monitoring those metrics and pulling that data typically either into an ecommerce CRM solution. There’s the right place to do these things and aggregate the data. Cloud inventory is fundamental for keeping track of profitability per order, profitability per SKU, the cost of goods sold, the value of inventory, how much inventory or cash are you sitting on? And then you look at those different elements. We can help identify the best tools for your business to get those answers

Jock: Can you give some examples of how, when a client comes to you and they’ve started tracking their data, how that’s changed the growth and profitability of their business?

Scott: Yeah, absolutely. One of…the key challenges are is that you’re awash in data, and things like Amazon Seller Central can provide some insights but not great insights. The key thing is, we’ve had people that have held back on purchasing inventory, or moving into another channel because they didn’t think their business was profitable, and they kept putting more and more money aside into savings, not understanding that they could see the trends in their business to really identify how they were doing as a business, that they were doing $50,000 at the beginning of January of last year, and that they’ve been easily adding, and you can look at it, 20% doing the things that they’re doing. Then what we can do is identify those trends where you see a month that dropped off, not just because it’s a month that’s not Christmas, and dig in, pull up the data, and say, “Hey, because we know this challenge, let’s go look,” and we were able to find what was going on. In their guts, most business owners know something’s wrong. Sometimes, and a lot of times, they might have the right gut reaction as to what it is – customer service or costs are a problem or repricing or competitors, but you can’t really get to that final answer to kind of teach your gut. Over time, we provide more and more value of really being able to analyze those numbers, so on a weekly basis, when we provide a cash flow report, they know what they should be spending their money on, whether it’s more marketing or more products, or a balance between the two, or when they can be safe to actually take money out themselves. There are a lot of people that really starve themselves personally for funds for way too long when they actually have a business that’s successful. We have a client now that has a full-time job, has a viable going ecommerce business. They’re going to clear well over a million dollars, and they’re concerned that can they afford to quit the job and my – our – response is, looking at the numbers, is they really can’t afford not to, because they have plenty of cash flow to cover their overhead and their personal overhead, and they can cover that change in their income from the job that was going to be a fixed amount of money that year with maybe a little bit of a bonus, to making more money each month in a week, and then the other three weeks, they’re just making additional profit between focus on selling, purchasing smarter, adding products, listing products faster online that they’ve bought, which is just cash sitting there getting no interest. Those are the kind of things that those decisions – bigger decisions as well as point decisions – that we really help make on a consistent basis because these conversations come up every week.

Jock: Let’s transition to someone that’s not at a million dollars in sales yet. You’ve got a lot of data from your clients that is helpful for someone growing an ecommerce business. What would be your tips for someone not yet at that million dollar mark?

Scott: Treat your business as a business, not a hobby. That means, do the basics. Sign up as a business, as an LLC or a partnership. Open up a separate business bank account. Make sure you get a federal EIN so that you’re putting any of the business assets against the business tax ID, not your personal one. Open up a business checking account and keep as much as possible, your finances separate, and keep track of every receipt. Scan it, take a picture on your phone, but treat it like a business. That’s the first piece. Get registered for a sales tax license, at least in your own state. There’s other issues related to an Amazon FBA seller which we could or could not talk about, it’s kind of down the rabbit hole with those things. But treat your business as a business and don’t commingle things. It’s OK to use a personal credit card to fund the inventory and keep your business going. Don’t commingle them. Use a separate card for the business and then use another card for going to the grocery store and buying clothes and living your life. You can use a personal one if you don’t have credit in your business yet. That’s fine. But treat it like a business. And then the next piece is, if you’re treating it like a business, is set up accounting. Our preference is zero.com, but QuickBooks online is a viable option as well. Connect it and do enough – you’re becoming an entrepreneur! Learn about doing the basics in accounting. And then, you can look at cloud inventory, but just keep track of everything. Keep a copy of everything, so when you go to that point so someone like us, or another CPA or someone else that can help you really organize your business can get access to that information so you have access to everything. And then make sure you stay compliant with sales tax using a tool like Taxjar.com or Taxify.co. But those are really the basics. Treat it like a business. Think about it – you’re being a business. Learn about being a business. Set up the basics of registering with the state and becoming a corporation. Separate checking account and then set up the basics that you need. These cloud accounting tools are only going to cost you $30 a month. Sales tax might cost you $10 a month plus a little bit for filing. And then look at a cloud inventory tool that might cost you between $50-100 a month, but it will help you optimize your business. If you do those things and take the time to optimize those things, those are the core basics and then you can grow from there.

Jock: We were having a discussion about valuation on businesses that are purely reliant on Amazon. I’m going to add a high level of a discount to that business. What are your thoughts on that particular topic?

Scott: The challenge with Amazon – selling on Marketplace – is, if you’re looking and you have your own brand, that’s a little bit separate. You can control the MAPP pricing. Those are other pieces. You’re one of many. There are rarely any areas where you’re the only seller there. There are a couple other challenges too, if you’re selling on Amazon FBA – so fulfilled by Amazon – where you ship your 1000 widgets to Amazon and they handle everything else. That’s wonderful from a logistics standpoint. You’re not packaging every single product, you send a couple big shipments once a month, a couple times a month, and then money just flows into your bank account every two weeks, and then you monitor customer service and then buy more products and move forward. From a logistic and starting standpoint, that’s really great. The challenge from an Amazon FBA seller is that Amazon generates sales tax Nexus in fifteen states. And that’s wherever Amazon has a warehouse, they’ll dynamically take all of your product and move it around. As a single seller, if you’re not selling your business, from a risk-management perspective, you can decide to, “I’m only going to register in my state, or a handful of states,” but that is a liability to the business, which is that sales tax liability, where you’re not collecting and remitting sales tax in 1-15 other additional states, so that’s one of those challenges where it’s one of those technicalities. It’s a risk-management decision, as the business owner, if you’re not going to sell. But if you’re looking forward to selling your business in x amount of time, you want to focus on making sure you’re sales-tax compliant, your personal property tax returns for your business, and, of course, any income taxes are all up to date on top of making sure you have accurate financials so that you get the full value of the business.

Jock: So let’s talk about cloud accounting. For those who don’t know what it is, can you explain it for me, and then can you explain the benefits for someone who’s already got an existing solution in place, but the solution you provide and how that’s different.

Scott: There’s a new world of tools in the cloud. Not only are your shopping carts and Amazon online, but there’s a wave of cloud accounting solutions, and the benefits of working with these and many cloud tools is that they’re modern interfaces, they’re easy to use, they’re in the cloud, so they’re available any time as long as you have internet access, which is most places anywhere in the US these days. You don’t have to be concerned about versions, or backing up the data, or making updates when there are new features or updates or changes to tax codes or other changes. You don’t have to do that; you pay for a solution that is stable and online in the cloud. The advantage of some of – the additional advantage of the accounting solutions is online, they connect to your online banking. So online every day, real time, each day, they download all the transactions from the previous day from your bank. You don’t have to type any transactions in. You don’t have to export and import any data. It’s going to dynamically pull all that information together. The other advantage is having a solid cloud accounting platform that has an ecosystem of add-on partners, like Shopify has add-on partners for mailing, through MailChimp or Constant Contact. Accounting systems like QuickBooks online or Zero have a whole ecosystem of add-on tools, whether it’s expense management, or bill payment, or cloud inventory. These tools will integrate together and feed all the information from one cloud app to another so you don’t have to do the data entry. And it’s always online. Compared to what a lot of businesses are on, they’re either on QuickBooks Desktop, or they’re using QuickBooks Enterprise, and advanced inventory, leveraging that tool. Now you can take a solution like that, instead of having it on one of your PCs in your office, which you have to back up and protect, and make sure it’s protected from viruses, from power outages, and all the other things you have to do to protect a server or a dedicated system with that data, you can host QuickBooks in the cloud, and there are a number of certified QuickBooks hosters in the cloud that will do the online backup and get you partway there. You still have QuickBooks which is a much older technology. It’s not a great database, it’s not optimized for the cloud, but you can keep using QuickBooks Desktop and QuickBooks Enterprise hosted in the cloud at places like Right Networks or Cloud Nine, and get partway to the cloud, so you get some of the protections, but you still don’t get all the automation, the efficiency, the automated upgrades, and a number of the other capabilities you get with a new cloud accounting platform. The next level of these cloud accounting platforms, is they’re finding newer, better, more efficient ways to get things done with automating billing and payments and automatic payments and receiving information from different areas, where there’s new capabilities, features, functions, and whole new ways of doing things that are much more efficient, that small business leveraging very dynamic cloud companies like Zero, can take advantage a lot faster than either mid-sized companies that are working on big solutions like Dynamics or NetSuite or others. These solutions are evolving rapidly, and you can take advantage of these functions very easily on an ongoing basis.

Jock: Let’s talk about sales tax. The conversation that we had the other day. What are the risks for an entrepreneur and, first of all, what don’t they know? And then, now that they know what they know, what are the risks?

Scott: Sales tax, unfortunately, is a reality for really any business, whether you’re a retail store and you’re collecting locally, or you’re an online business. It is a reality. It is based off main term called nexus and where does your business have nexus? Your business has nexus where you are, where you’re registered as a business, where your employees live and work, and you’re where you have significant personal property, whether that’s a warehouse or your inventory, and you own your inventory until it’s received by the end customer at their home. It’s where you store inventory, not where it’s in transit. You’re only in one state, all of your employees are in one place, your warehouse is there, you have nexus in one state. Where you have nexus, you are required by law to register for a sales tax license, collect sales tax on every transaction where anybody’s buying in that state, not anywhere in the US, but in the state where you have a tax license, and giving all that money that you collect to the state. It is worse to not collect any sales tax and owe money out of your own profits to a state, than you holding money that you’ve collected as sales taxes and not given it to the state. That’s where you cross over into illegal criminal activity. It’s painful to register online for many of these states. Then you have to know how much you’ve collected and how much you should collect. Most shopping carts have an automated configuration, whether it’s Amazon or Shopify or Big Commerce, that you can say, “Hey, I’m in Florida or Colorado or California,” and it will start automatically calculating sales tax, collecting it, and giving it to you. So if you turned on sales tax a year ago, and you’ve never filed or remitted, you need to go look at how much money you’ve collected and make sure you go file that. Another challenge is, if you’re an Amazon FBA seller, you need to collect or remit in up to 15 states. It’s your decision on which ones you register in. You want to register. To keep track of that, manage it, you really want to look at an automated tool, like Taxjar or Taxify.co, that will pull in all the data from YouCommerce or Shopify or Amazon or wherever else and you can upload any direct sales or any other sales you have which will total up all the information and then show you how it needs to be broken down so you can fill and file those sales tax funds that you’ve collected. Or at Taxify.co, that will actually file in all 50 states. Taxjar will file in some states, up to 26 states, and Taxify will file in all 50 states. It’s kind of a matter of registering where you have nexus, collecting sales tax and configuring it, and another key component is if you have sales tax nexus, you have to collect on all sales, so if you sell on Amazon, EBay, Etsy, and your own shopping cart, and in person, you need to collect sales tax for all of those transactions. Make sure you’ve configured every site. It’s still fairly complicated for getting every site. In general, sales tax is extremely complex. There are 13,000 jurisdictions in the US. We’ve gone a little crazy on the compliance stuff. What you can do is make the best effort, find a balance between the time or cost that you’re paying for someone to either do this for you, or for you to do it yourself, to be compliant. And there’s no law that says that you have to spend 100% of your time or all your profits or anything else on the business. You need to find that balance of risk management, but you always want to stay current in your own state, where they can come audit you, both as a business in the state, and you’re physically there. So, those are the key elements. What you don’t know is that one of the hard things…it’s make the best bet, do a little bit of research, read a few blogs. You will hear people finding different things of “I found this trick to not do it!” Well….no. There are a few tricks, like with California. The big trick, I’ll tell you, is you want to register for a sales tax license, not with the Secretary of State, in any of these states, especially California, because if you register for a sales tax license, you’re saying, “I want to be able to sell products.” If you register with the Secretary of State, you’re saying, “I’m a business in that state.” Then you might have to pay income tax in that state, and a ton of other paperwork, you’ve got to pay your accountant to do an income tax return in that state. So when it comes to California or any other states, especially your Amazon sellers, you can only log on to the California site to log on and register online, but when you get to the point where it asks you for the Secretary of State information, stop there, save your reservation, call the Board of Equalization in California and tell them that you’re just a remote seller, and they’ll uncheck that requirement to register with the Secretary of State, and then you can get only a sales tax license. The only state, if you’re an Amazon FBA seller, that requires, by law, that you can’t get a sales tax license without registering in the state, is the state of Washington. That’s my super-detailed tip that I’ll cover

Jock: What haven’t I discussed that you want to talk about?

Scott: OK, you didn’t go into business to do accounting, but take the time to understand your business. Whether you’re watching TED talks, or you’re reading business books, you really want to take the time to continue to grow your education as an entrepreneur. I suggest getting the book Financial Intelligence for Entrepreneurs. It’s very dry reading. It’ll take you a while to get through it. Keep in mind, I’m not an accountant, my partner is. But you will start to learn the terminology. You’ll start to learn when you show some business people your financials, and they can look and in five seconds, tell you that your business is either failing or doing well or talk to you about it, and that’s where you can start learning about those things. So what I have to say is, if you’re going to do the accounting yourself, educate yourself. You don’t have to enjoy it, but it’s a reality of being in business. If you’re going to outsource anything, whether it’s the accounting or the warehouse or whatever else, do it yourself for a while so you understand what you are outsourcing. When you’re interacting, just make it clear as to what your expectations are. You want specific reporting and answers to specific questions, but in general, keeping track and knowing your numbers will help you stay in business. There are a lot of businesses that are profitable but go out of business because they’re not monitoring cash flow, which is critical. There are other businesses that you don’t realize you’re losing money, and you don’t take the time to cut back and drop products or make other big changes to stay in business because you’re just not aware of the issue until it’s too late. Take the time, and when you’re ready to outsource, do it as smartly as you possibly can.

Jock: If someone wants more information about your services, where can they go?

Scott: Thank you Jock. You can go to our website, which is CatchingClouds.net. Please look around. We have quite a few blogs. We’re constantly trying to share the information so if you have any specific questions. The best thing if you have very specific questions and you’re interested in outsourcing your accounting services, please contact us at 720-414-1444 ext. 1. Or you can reach out to [email protected] and we’ll definitely respond. We really enjoy working with entrepreneurs and ecommerce entrepreneurs that have already taken the risks, that are putting their kids’ college fund or looking to quit their job, or if they’ve quit their job or they have an established ecommerce business and they’ve been doing it for years, we really enjoy working with these people, helping them optimize their businesses and make them better. Jock, I really appreciate the opportunity to talk today.

Filed Under: Blog

Why Berkshire Hathaway Loves Recurring Online Businesses

May 19, 2015 By jock

Fan of Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway and ever wondered if they lost everything today how they would start over again? Well in this interview we chat with a fellow value investor Mason Myers from Greybull Stewardship about that exact conundrum.

Listen To The Full Interview:

[powerpress]

Subscribe to Podcast: Itunes

user_146801

On this week’s episode, we talk with Mason Myers. Mason shares his experience investing in companies as a value investor. We discuss why Berkshire Hathaway loves to invest in recurring online businesses. We also talk about value investing, search funds and investing in general.

What You’ll Learn From This Episode:

  • Lessons from a value investor
  • What is value investing and why is it important
  • Can you sell your online business to search funds?
  • Why Berkshire loves recurring online businesses

Featured On The Show:

  • Article: Why Berkshire loves recurring businesses
  • Grey Bull Stewardship
  • Mason’s Blog

Transcription:

Jock: Welcome back to another episode of the Digital Exits Podcast. I’m your host, Jock Purtle. And today, we have Mason Myers, from

MasonMyers.com and also Greybull Stewardship. Mason, welcome to the podcast.

Mason: Thank you very much, Jock. It’s good to be here.

Jock: Excellent. So we’re just chatting on the call beforehand. I actually came across your personal blog when I was doing some research into search funds, and I was telling Mason that I read every single article on his site over a one or two day period, which is a big kudos to him. Love the content. He talks about investing through his company, Greybull, and then value investing, which I’m a big fan of. For those who don’t know, value investing was coined through the book The Intelligent Investor, and then Warren Buffett has built his fortune based on that sort of strategy. So let’s jump over to you. Want to give everyone sort of a quick background of you as an entrepreneur, and then do you want to tell me a little bit about Greybull?

Mason: You bet. Thank you, Jock. I began as an entrepreneur and an operator, so my heart really is with management teams and the founders of companies. Right out of college, I was into journalism, and I started messing around with the internet. I graduated from college in 1993, so, started a company in ’94, bootstrapped it, merged it with another company, got venture financing, went public, and did a lot of M&A through that public company. So that’s sort of where I learned to do M&A deals, and to work with other entrepreneurs and founders. To jump ahead a little bit, I started my investment fund, Greybull Stewardship, in 2010, and we are focused on companies with $1-3 million in EBITDA. Usually they’ve been around for a while, they’re good companies, and they’re growing well. They need capital for growth or they want to take some chips off the table, and that’s what I’m focused on today.

Jock: So I guess there’s two lines of questions there. With Greybull, did you raise a fund? Was it your personal capital? What’s the partner structure? Tell us a little bit about that.

Mason: Because I came at investing from being an entrepreneur and an operator, I really wanted to find an investment structure that worked best for entrepreneurs. So what I focused on was finding an evergreen fund structure, where we’re not forced to sell the companies on a certain timeframe. As you know, Jock, most investment funds are operated on a ten-year time horizon. So the investors are forced to make the investment, grow the companies as fast as they can, and then sell them again, which may work great for certain companies, but for other companies, maybe they want to own it for a longer period of time and let the value compound, or pursue a different strategy that doesn’t necessarily work in that timeframe. So I wanted to make sure my investment fund worked for them. So the most important thing to know is that it exists in perpetuity. There is not a ten-year fund life to it. So we can own the companies as long as it makes sense, and I won’t put pressure on the entrepreneurs to sell sooner or later or whatever it may be.

So yes, I did raise funds from other folks, and from my own funds. The fund works on four-year cycles, so I get a refresh of capital every four years.

Jock: So it sounds more like an operating company rather than a fund structure. Would that be a good summation?

Mason: Yes, in a way. I know we’ll get to Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway a little bit later, but I really tried to model this on what he’s been able to do. He says that his favorite time frame for an investment, or his favorite hold period for an investment, is forever. There are obvious reasons for that, because you get tax advantages, and you get a lot of value by just letting the companies compound in value over time. So yes, I wanted to create a structure where you could hold investments for a long time, just like he does. And yes, Berkshire, as you know, has many operating company characteristics, because it owns operating companies, and that’s the same with Greybull Stewardship.

Jock: So let’s go to your philosophy on value investing. What does value investing mean to you?

 

Mason: Well, I think what it means to me is, as an investor, the safest way to invest is to buy something at a fair price, and sometimes at a good price, but particularly when you’re talking to good companies who are growing, no one’s giving their company away, so the idea is to try to find a fair price for both the seller or the founder, and myself. So for me, it means, number 1, getting into the investment at a fair price and not overpaying too much. And the fair price means to me that you’re paying on fundamentals of the business. Ultimately, it comes back to a projection or forecast of the cash flows that an owner could expect to take out of the business both today and into the future. In investing, that often gets boiled down to EBITDA or free cash flow, or something like that. So I like to think of businesses as a multiple of free cash flow minus capbacks, or a multiple of EBITDA. And that’s the way I think about it. As Buffett says, “Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.” So I focus a lot on trying to pay a fair price and make sure I get a lot of value.

 

Jock: What’s a fair price?

 

Mason: It’s such a difficult question because all companies are so different. So I think it depends on the size of the company. It depends on the growth rate of the company. It depends on the competitive advantages, or, as Buffett would say, “the moat around the company,” which is really a way of saying, “How certain are you that these cash flows are going to continue well into the future?” I operate in smaller companies, $1-3 million in EBITDA, sometimes a little smaller, so typically I think that those EBITDA multiples, when you take all of those factors above and others, they probably trade anywhere from 4-5-6-7 X EBITDA, something in that range.

 

Jock: Have you seen valuation prices fluctuate over the five years that Greybull’s been alive?

 

Mason: What I find interesting…yes is a way to answer that question but to separate that into two buckets. The first bucket is larger companies and public companies and so forth, and those valuations have definitely gone up. Today they are much higher than they were previously. When you get into smaller companies, it’s more about finding the right fit between the investor or the buyer and the seller or the person seeking growth capital. So those valuations actually do not fluctuate as much, maybe a little bit, as they sort of reflect the trends of what’s going on in the broader investment world. Really, it becomes more about finding the fit between the two sides of the table. And so that becomes more important than the pure valuation, which means the valuations are not fluctuating as much in that part of the marketplace.

 

Jock: So you look for businesses that want either growth capital or for the entrepreneur to take some money off the table. Are there any other sorts of structures that you’ll invest in, or are those the only two?

 

Mason: Those usually capture the bulk of what the objectives are of the founder, the owner of the business. Of course, you can do a combination of the two, and I’ve done that several times, where they’re selling some equity to diversify, but also we’re putting money into the business so that we can help grow the business. But yeah, it’s usually some combination of those.

 

Jock: And then, are these companies coming to you, or are you finding them through bankers, or what’s the deal there?

 

Mason: It’s both. I think the most important characteristic of what the investments that I end up having made is that we both, myself and my partner, the founder of the business, usually spend a lot of time making sure it’s a good fit. I named my company Greybull Stewardship. Greybull is a little town in Wyoming where I was born, but I put the word “stewardship” there because I wanted to convey to founders that I want to be a good steward of their company and what they’ve built and support them in being a good steward. So really, I tend to find entrepreneurs and founders who really care about who their partner is. They’re not selling and bailing out and going to do something else. Maybe they’re selling a minority of their company to grow, maybe they’re selling a majority but they’re staying involved, so really we both have usually spent a lot of time making sure there’s a good fit with strategy, with personality, with timeframe – you know, maybe the entrepreneur has something in mind with what they want to do with the business – etc, so that’s usually the most important thing that happens, regardless of whether I meet the entrepreneur through a banker, or we meet independently. People drop me e-mails all the time through my website, and that’s often a way to get introduced. I am also often introduced to people by my investors, the people who’ve invested in Greybull Stewardship. So it’s all of the above, but once the introduction happens, it’s usually about making sure it’s a good fit.

 

Jock: So let’s move gears and talk about tech, because you’ve got a lot of technology that is destructing sort of very mature, old businesses. I guess the question to throw at you is, Can companies really survive forever with so much innovation and disruption happening, and it’s going to happen in the future?

 

Mason: I think that’s a very good point, and if you were to look at the data, the half-life of how long companies last in the S&P 500, for example, it’s gone down dramatically in the last 100 years. Obviously, with technology always changing things, it creates a lot more dynamism and ever-changing landscape for the company. So yes, I think it’s not possible to stay forever, but I do think it’s possible to identify companies that have stronger competitive advantages, and have a reasonable likelihood of succeeding maybe 5, 10, 15 years into the future, and you can make a reasonably educated guess about that. I tend to like those companies better, where even if the technology changes, you can see how they have strengths that will allow them to be successful for 5 or 10 or 15 years. I’m not so good with things that may be hot for a year or two, and then who knows what happens? I just don’t find that that necessarily fits my personality, and plus, it’s extremely difficult to pick companies that are going to be very successful in a year or two in a rapidly changing environment.

 

Jock: A great show for someone that’s fresh or has no idea about competitive advantage to watch is Shark Tank. They’re always talking about what differentiates you from your competitors. I guess my question to you is, you’re making a decision purely based on the future cash flow potential of the business, but also that “moat” that we talk about, that competitive advantage. What in your mind defines sustainable competitive advantage?

 

Mason: That’s a very difficult question, and it’s hard to answer without using a lot of clichés, but I’ll do the best I can. Really, sustainable competitive advantage to me, means, is there some advantage that the company has that other companies, no matter how hard they try, are really not going to be able to replicate or put a dent in that company’s business model? You can get into, then, sort of ideas or lists of things that make competitive advantages strong. Some of them that many people have cited, but I think that are helpful even though they are very rare and probably not that replicable for most people, are things that have network effects to them. Maybe it’s a two-sided marketplace where each side benefits by having the other side be very large. A couple of classic ones are Microsoft’s operating system and Google on search. So Google will always have better search results when they have 80-90% of people doing search through them, because they can always tweak the algorithm and they have the best data to deliver the best searches. It’s really difficult for someone else to break into that, because they can’t ever get a large enough search volume. Microsoft operating system, same sort of thing. So those network effect things’ competitive advantages are happening more and more, particularly because they’re enabled by the internet, and two-sided markets. And you can sort of go down recent huge success stories of AirBNB or Alibaba or über, all sorts of great network effects. You can see them in real time happening in front of us all right now. Beyond that, oh, go ahead Jock…

 

Jock: Can you define a network effect for me a little bit better?

 

Mason: Usually it’s easiest to think of it in a two-sided marketplace like über. Each side benefits more by participating in the marketplace that has the most people on the other side of the market. So if you’re a consumer wanting to use über, you want to go to the place where they have the most drivers. If you’re a driver, you want to go to the marketplace where they have the most users. So the service is more valuable to each participant because of the large numbers on each side of the marketplace. So someone else cannot break into there unless they have as many cars on one side or as many consumers on the other side of that marketplace.

 

Jock: Right, so I guess I might talk about a business we had recently where one side of the equation was servicing big box retailers, the other side of the equation was servicing wholesaling vendors, and they had a technology in place that made it easier for both parties. I’m just going to use an example we had. Is that a sustainable competitive advantage?

 

Mason: I don’t know. I’d have to know a little bit more about it. What do you think? What did you see in it?

 

Jock: My questioning around it was, could someone go and develop a similar technology? And they probably could, for a million bucks or something. And then the other question I asked was, could someone go and steal those companies that they were servicing, those big-box retailers? And I guess, yes, they could. It would probably take a year or two sale cycle, but technically they could do that. And then if one falls, then probably they all fall, if that makes sense. I don’t know. This is not my strongest suit.

 

Mason: I think, from what you just said, it sounds like there are some advantages. You like that, where they could have a couple of years of runway, but I think it’s very helpful to think about the ones where no matter how much money you have, or how much time you have, a new competitor or new entrant cannot necessarily replicate the advantage. So you could think about über, or Google search, or Microsoft operating system, or Coca-Cola’s distribution system. A lot of people think about Coca-Cola’s brand as a competitive advantage, which it is, but I think the stronger one is the decades of investment they have made in having a Coke within reach no matter where you are in the world. It’s almost unfathomable to think about how you would replicate that distribution network from scratch, which then makes it an unbelievable competitive advantage for the long-term.

 

Jock: That makes a lot of sense. How do I compete against über? I can’t, to be honest. Look at Lyft. Lyft is trying to compete, but they don’t have the distribution or the customer base. That’s a good point. I guess the question, then, gets reframed. You, personally, are buying smaller businesses in the $1-3 million EBITDA range. Technically, if someone had a big enough checkbook, they could come and replicate that business model. So I guess my question to you is, how do you find that sustainable competitive advantage on a smaller business?

 

Mason: That’s a great question. What you may be looking for is not something like Coke or Google or über, but something that within its niche, within its marketplace, it has almost as equivalent of a competitive advantage. Even if you had billions of dollars, you wouldn’t necessarily go after that for some reason. Maybe it’s too small of a market, even though it’s a very nice healthy marketplace for the companies I invest in. Maybe there are reasons why your structure of your company wouldn’t allow you to go after that marketplace, for example. Plus, I like to take the lessons and the models from the very successful companies and try and see them at work in smaller marketplaces. One investment that I’ve made – I haven’t yet announced it, but I can announce it here – is a company called OnSource. What they do is they, on one side of their market, they have insurance companies, who need photos taken of autos or homes, usually once a claim has come in and they need to have a photo of the car’s bumper or whatever. On the other side of the market is a network of thousands and tens of thousands of independent contractors who take the photos. So via a smartphone app just like an über driver, they accept a job, they go and take the photos and then get paid through the app. That’s a different marketplace, but within that marketplace, this company has huge competitive advantages, because it’s nearly impossible for a new entrant to replicate the network of independent contractors that they have. The insurance companies may have a different dynamic. Someone, theoretically, I think, could sell into them over time, but the insurance companies are always going to want to go to the marketplace where they can get their photos taken the fastest, because there’s the biggest network of people there. So it may not be as big of a market as the world-wide taxi market like über’s going after, but it’s going to be a pretty big market, and you can see the dynamics that that company has, which gives it very, very big advantages over anybody else who would try and come in.

 

Jock: So I think we’ve talked a little bit about B2B sustainable competitive advantage. What about business-to-consumer sustainable competitive advantage?

 

Mason: Well, we’ve talked about B2C a little bit, with Google search, and über, and things like that. I think the same dynamics actually apply. B2C, I, in a way like those maybe even a little bit more, because it feels like millions of individual consumers is a bigger network effect than, call it hundreds or thousands of businesses. It feels like it might be easier for a hundred businesses to make a different decision than it would take for millions and millions of consumers to make a different decision. So I like it when there are many, many players on either side of the market.

 

Jock: That makes sense. I was just thinking in terms of smaller companies. The examples we’re using seem to be a lot more B2B, rather than B2C.

 

Mason: Yeah, I hear that.

 

Jock: Well, let’s talk search funds. A client of ours came to us and suggested that we do some outreach to a search fund in terms of an acquisition for their business. At the time, I had no concept of what they were or what they were all about. I did some Googling and found a great article that you wrote. What’s your experience been with search funds, and what are your comments on them?

 

Mason: I think they’re a great innovation. I think there are two related innovations in sort of financing of businesses and the M&A marketplace for businesses. One is search funds, which we’ll talk more about, and the other is independent sponsors, or what used to be called fundless sponsors. In both cases, a person or group of people find a company and strike a deal with the company, and then go find the capital to close the deal. This is an innovation, because 20, 30 years ago, you needed to raise funds through a traditional private equity fund structure, a venture capital structure, and these days, there’s just a lot more innovation happening. These two innovations are interesting, and obviously, other ones are crowdfunding and AngelList and that sort of thing. To get more into a search fund, as you know, Jock, they tend to be people coming right out of business school, so they’re relatively young. They’re in their 20s or 30s usually, and they have some management experience and some business background, and they want to run a company. So they raise a little bit of money to fund a search process over a 1-2 year period, to then try and find a company. When they find a company, the people who funded the search get a first shot at financing the acquisition. Then the search fund person takes over the company and starts running it.

 

Jock: What experience have you had with them, if any?

 

Mason: I’ve not invested in search funds myself, because I like the model where the management team at the company is staying in place, and search funds tend to like a situation where the founder or the management team is leaving so that they can take over and run the company. But I’ve interacted with many, many search funders over the years. There’s a wide variety of outcomes. You have people who spend a couple of years trying to find a business and they just can’t find it, or they had a couple of false starts in their couple of years and they just couldn’t get a deal done by the time they need to go on and do something else. And then you have people that have had unbelievable, humongous successes. The most famous search fund success is a company called Asurion, which is insurance for cell phones, and it has become a multi-billion dollar business that has been recapitalized several times by very large private equity funds. So the search funders who did Asurion are as successful as any household name tech entrepreneur that you could name.

 

Jock: I want to pick up one point. You said that you like to keep management in place, whereas search funds like to take management out and replace them with new management or operators. What is your take on the pros and cons of doing that?

 

Mason: Well, there’s certainly a place for both. When I say the search funds usually like to take over the company, usually, it’s in a very friendly way, with a transition period with the existing management team or founders. So everyone’s going into this wanting to make it successful and there’s usually a transition period and it usually goes pretty well. But I think it’s just different strokes for different folks. The search funders want to have the experience of running a business, and certainly there’s a lot of business owners out there who want to sell and don’t want to keep running the business after a transition period. So there’s a really natural fit there between those two things. I like to find businesses where the management team has a lot of equity, wants to keep some equity, and wants to stay in place. For me, it’s just a strategy selection, because I like situations where the management team has a great track record with a particular business, because that gives a much higher likelihood that that track record is going to continue into the future. I like that as an investor. I also am a pretty hands-off investor. I like to be available if and when a management team or founding group wants to discuss something or kick something around or whatever, but I like it when they’re independent and making the decisions about running their company themselves. That tends to be the case if they founded a company or they’ve been running a company for a long time, you have a pretty good degree of confidence that they’re going to run it well into the future.

 

Jock: Have you had any experience where you’ve had to replace management completely? Or where you’ve got a smaller company where it’s 100% owner operated? I’m just thinking from our listener point-of-view. Most of the people that buy businesses through our brokerage are becoming owner-operators, so my question to you is, do you have any advice for them? Have you got any advice to a company that, let’s say, is an investment portfolio that is buying the business and then having to replace the operator? What’s a checklist on success of that business moving forward, if that makes sense?

 

Mason: When I came out of business school, I did what you could call an unfunded search. I bought a business where the owner wanted to leave, and I was going to step in and run the business. So I’ve done that personally, and I’ve done it in other situations where we’re buying a business and the CEO wanted to leave so we needed to hire a new CEO. It’s difficult, is what I would say. I think that the first thing is that the person buying a business should go into it with their eyes wide open. They need to find ways to learn as much as they possibly can from the outgoing management team. Whether that’s a lot of little interactions before the deal closes, or whether it’s a specified transition period after the deal closes, or both, I think they need to find ways to interact a lot with the management team and sort of learn as much as they can. The other advice I would give people is generally, I would give the existing people the benefit of the doubt in the decisions that they’ve made. So you might look at a business and see lots of decisions that they’ve made that you agree with, and lots of decisions that they’ve made that you may not agree with. But I would be slow to make big, huge changes to a business that’s working, and really make sure that you deeply understand why the prior management team made the choices that they did before dramatically changing things. Now, of course, there are always reasons and times that you need to make dramatic changes for whatever reason. But if the business is working well, I think it’s better to sort of watch and see the business in operations for a while and then later make decisions or changes if you need to. What else comes to mind? I’ve been in situations where you want to make the change right away and the old management team isn’t around anymore at all, and I’ve also made transitions where the people stick around. No matter what, I think it helps everybody to make the transition just the right amount of time, but not too long. If it’s belabored or too long, I think the people in the company get confused about who they should be going to for decisions and for answers. So you want to make sure it’s long enough for you to learn, but once that period’s done, you want to make the transition so there’s a clear leadership.

 

Jock: Are you a fan of the 100-day strategy or the first 100 day strategy?

 

Mason: I think it’s a helpful tool, for sure. It’s a helpful tool to get your thinking started. I would almost not force yourself to do too much in the 100 days. Most of the businesses that we buy, it takes a year before you really understand how things are going. In a lot of businesses, there’s seasonality, where Q4 may be great and Q2 may not be so great. So you can’t really implement a 100-day strategy because you really need to watch a whole annual cycle for how the business works. I think it may sound good and maybe there are some simple things like accounting, monthly reporting, Qmetrix Dashboards, and things like that that you may want to put in place that are good things to do in the first 100 days, but as far as deeply understanding a business, I think it takes watching and living inside a business for a year before you can really feel confident that you understand it.

 

Jock: Very nice advice. Let’s go to Charlie Munger’s comment about if he had his time over again, he would be buying online, recurring-based businesses. What’s your take on that comment?

 

Mason: I think it’s very interesting because, as your listeners may know, Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger, the chairman and vice-chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, have often said they don’t want to invest in technology businesses because they’re too difficult for them to understand. What they mean by that is they can’t necessarily predict what’s going to be the dynamic in the business in ten years into the future. What I like about what he said, is that it’s showing that the things that they’ve looked for throughout their investing life can be found in spades in online businesses. And that there are many of them. So that’s one, is that there’s a lot of opportunity to find them. Number two, that when you do find them, they tend to have very rapid value creation like some of the behemoths that we talked about earlier. So if you look at their track record, they’ve looked for competitive advantages, economies of scale advantages, network effects, in what they did in the heart of their investing career. So you could pick out a few things like newspapers. Back in the day, those had a network effect component to it because advertisers wanted to be with the newspaper that had the most readers, and the readers wanted to go to the newspaper that had the most content and the most other readers, because they wanted to be seeing what everyone else was seeing. Big consumer products companies that had invested in big distribution networks and brands and so forth. A lot of the elements of online businesses with recurring revenue, unique direct-to-consumer distribution patterns, brands, recurring revenue, those are things that they’ve looked at throughout their life. It would just be applying their same thinking to this vast arena of online businesses today.

 

Jock: Maybe I’ll throw in a personal question. You invested in a business brokerage. Tell me about that deal and why you thought it was a good investment.

 

Mason: There are a couple of reasons why I thought it was a good investment. First, the business is called Murphy Business Brokerage, so this is a franchise company whose franchisees help people buy and sell Main Street businesses, so construction companies, restaurants, nail salons, and things like that that would be your normal Main Street type of business. There are several reasons, but the first that comes to mind is that I live this every day, and I see the need. When people are buying and selling businesses, they’re often not experienced at doing it, and it helps them to have an experienced person by their side, helping them through every step of the process. I’ve written several blog posts about the benefits of doing that, so I know there’s a need. I’ve also seen the advantages that a franchisee of Murphy has over an independent broker who may be trying to buy and sell businesses. Murphy can make one investment in a database or a certain technology or research on valuations, or any subset of Main Street businesses, dental offices or restaurants or whatever. They can make these big investments which is very hard for a solo practitioner to make. So all these franchisees get tremendous value by being part of the Murphy system. And it helps them when a gym owner wants to sell their gym, inevitably, across the country, there are five other Murphy brokers who’ve sold gyms and they can share their experience and wisdom with what it takes to sell a gym properly. There are some competitive advantages there, certainly over solo practitioner brokers, and the Murphy system is vastly superior in their technology and their training, than other brokerage systems that are trying to build this sort of national network. So there’s a lot of competitive advantage there. The last reason is that they’re really high-quality, high-integrity people in the system, and, as you know, Jock, that’s a really important thing with any intermediary or brokerage business. You want to make sure you’re working with the best people.

 

Jock: Bit of a selfish question there, but thanks for the answer. Anything that I haven’t asked that you thought about, that you might want to share?

 

Mason: We touched on recurring revenue a little bit. You had asked me about that earlier as we were talking. That is another point that I wanted to make with online businesses. If you can think about the recurring revenue that Buffett and Munger saw in consumer products companies and they still see today with backing of Heinz or Burger King or Anheuser-Busch deals. Duracell, Gillette, all sorts of things that they’ve done through the years with consumer products. With the newspaper type businesses. They love situations where you know the revenue is going to be there in the future. I think with online businesses, particularly subscription-based, SaaS models, or other recurring revenue models, that’s really a key element of having a valuable business. I think a lot of the businesses that you probably are working with, Jock, have that component and that characteristic, which would be really important for your buyers to make sure they appreciate and understand the value of that.

 

Jock: If we look at the sales data on recurring SaaS-based businesses, versus say, an e-commerce businesses or an advertising based site, SaaS is certainly selling at a much higher multiple than the other business models.

 

Mason: Yeah, no question. The marketplace has really come to appreciate that, as it should.

 

Jock: When I do a valuation on a company, I’m always saying that at the end of the day, my valuation is a guess. What the market’s going to pay for the business is what the market is going to pay for the business. That data on recurring valuations basically backs up everything we’ve been talking about for the last forty minutes.

 

Mason: Yup. Very much so.

 

Jock: Good stuff. If someone wants to find some more information about you, do you want to give them some resources?

 

Mason: You bet. I appreciate the comments you said about my blog earlier, Jock, and that website is my name, MasonMyers.com, and my investment fund is called Greybull Stewardship, and you can find it just by doing a Google search. Yeah, thank you very much, Jock, I appreciate being here.

 

Jock: No worries. And I’m happy to give you a plug for Greybull. What’s the perfect type of business that you’re looking for?

 

Mason: I love recurring-revenue online businesses that are growing at a healthy rate, and the management team wants some capital for growth or to take some chips off the table and they want a good partner for the long term.

Filed Under: Blog

How To Get On Shark Tank With Eric Bandholz

April 21, 2015 By jock

Always been curious what it was like behind the scenes of the TV show Shark Tank? Wondered if ‘Mr. Wonderful’ was really as mean and nasty as the TV show depicts? Wondered how you could get your business featured on Shark Tank yourself? Well this episode covers all of those questions.

Listen To The Full Interview:

[powerpress]

Subscribe to Podcast: Itunes

eric

 

On this week’s episode, we talk with the original Urban Beardsman himself, Eric Bandholz. Eric shares his experience pitching on ABC’s Shark Tank. We also discuss the process that he went through, what he learnt from the show and how the show has affected his sales and his profit. Tune in to hear all the tips Eric shares with Digital Exits.

What You’ll Learn From This Episode:11129550_10204474501888979_1336488770582969670_n

  • How Eric got on Shark Tank
  • How the Shark Tank Process works
  • What each of the individual sharks were like
  • The number 1 piece of advice that Mark Cuban gave him

 

Featured On The Show:

  • Eric’s blog of the experience
  • Shark Tank Beard Brand Episode

Transcription:

Jock: Welcome back to another episode of the Digital Exits podcast. I’m your host, Jock Purtle, and today we have the one, and the only, the Beardsman himself, Mr. Eric Bandholz.

Eric: What is going on, Jock?

Jock: So, before we start, can you give me your intro to every single YouTube video that you have, which I absolutely love?

Eric: Ok. Yeah. What’s going on, Internet? It is your boy, Eric Bandholz, back again with another awesome episode from Beardbrand. Hope all’s going well on the other side of the Internet.

Jock: Perfect. So today we’re going to be discussing how to get on Shark Tank. And you had the great opportunity of being on probably what is one of my favorite US TV shows. So I guess for everyone that doesn’t know you, quick background, who you are, where you’re from, and then a little bit about Beardbrand?

Eric: So as he already said, I’m Eric Bandholz with Beardbrand, and Beardbrand is a men’s grooming company that focuses primarily on beard care. We started and grew primarily through our online sales but have branched out into working with retailers and growing our wholesale line as well. So we manufacture our products as well as retail our products. And we’re a pretty young company. We’re just over two years of being in business and have bootstrapped our business to where we’re at today.

Jock: So I know your history in intimate detail, but you started out with a blog. And then that sort of progressed to an event, which was like a startup event where you met your founders, and then out of that spurned the ecommerce store, and I guess I want to, maybe let’s go into the Shark Tank pitch before we sort of go into numbers, and so, I guess we’ll start out with…what was the deal with Shark Tank? Did you reach out to them? Did they reach out to you? How did it all start?

Eric: So it’s probably a funny story. Lindsay, out of the blue, e-mailed me and was like, “Have you heard of this Mark Cuban guy?” And I’m like, “Yeah, he’s like only one of the most prominent businessmen in America and has done a lot of really cool things.” It was her first time. She ran into him talking down here in Austin, Texas, and just loved what he said, loved how he presented everything. I think it was after that that she did a little more digging and found out, of course that he was on Shark Tank, and she submitted an application for us to appear on Shark Tank. So we did it the old-fashioned way, we just filled out a form and e-mailed it on to their yahoo.com e-mail address.

Jock: (laughs) Good deal. So just for everyone, Lindsay’s your business partner. And so, it was just basically, saw Cuban speak, and then just decided to apply. Was there any thought that you’d get on? What was the mindset when you sent that e-mail?

Eric: So we’ve always, and this is probably, Jock, you know me. I’m a very humble guy. As a very humble guy, I kind of knew that our story was interesting and that no one was doing what we were doing. So I was pretty sure and pretty confident that we would end up on the show. I think we were doing some pretty cool stuff and making some waves and doing it in a way that a lot of other companies out there aren’t doing it. I thought we had a pretty good story to tell and a pretty legitimate shot of getting on there.

Jock: So before Lindsay sort of threw the idea of Mark Cuban at you, had you thought about applying before that?

Eric: Yeah, I don’t think there was a day that went by when someone said, “Hey, you should do Shark Tank.” “Hey, you should do Shark Tank.” We used to get that all the time. When we first came out with our business, Beardbrand, beard care was a total niche market. It did not exist before us. The concept of guys taking care of their beards was 100% new to probably 99.999% of people. So it’s those kind of really new ideas that like to be shown on Shark Tank. I think it was pretty clear that it was a new idea to a lot of people. Nowadays there’s a lot more competition out there for that. But definitely as we’ve grown, it’s been a standout organization.

Jock: Sure. Now I know there was a little bit of hesitancy from one of the partners in particular going on the show, so tell me about that. How did you weigh out the pros and cons?

Eric: There’s definitely a lot of risk of being on the show. As a business entrepreneur, and I would imagine that a lot of entrepreneurs relate to this, you like being in control. You control how you’re going to invest your money, what kinds of products you’re going to buy, who you’re going to hire. Everything’s within your grasp. But when you go on Shark Tank, you give up a lot of control. You almost give up all of the control. Like the whole process of getting on the show, you don’t have that control. If you film, you don’t have that opportunity of how they’re going to edit it, nor what the sharks are going to say or how they’re going to perceive it. All that is kind of outside your control. So you’ve got to put a lot of faith in there that the show’s got your best interests in heart and that they can accurately portray the events that happen when you’re up there for the pitch. So we were a little bit hesitant to that and the other thing that we were concerned about is up to our show, a lot of the contestants, I don’t want to say contestants, a lot of those entrepreneurs had almost been kind of kitschy ideas, like almost kind of gimmicky. We’re real serious about our product. We’re real serious about beard care, and changing the way society views beardsmen. This isn’t a joke for us, and we didn’t want to be perceived as a joke. So that was one of the big risks that we were weighing out as well. Would they be able to understand a company that’s worked hard to build a brand rather than just simply sell a gimmicky product?

Jock: Sure. Let’s run through the process. So you sent off the e-mail. Let’s work through some dates. So when did you first e-mail them your pitch?

Eric: That would’ve been, I think it was like, about May. I’ve got to get all these dates. May of 2014. No, I’m way off. That’s when we heard from them. We originally sent in our application in September of 2013.

Jock: OK.

Eric: It was very early. It was month number 8 of our business.

Jock: Between the time you sent the e-mail and you actually heard back from them, it was 8 months, is that right?

Eric: Yeah, it was from…

Jock: I just did the maths. Roughly 8 months.

Eric: I’ll trust you.

Jock: (Laughs) Good deal. That’s a long time, really. When do they do the casting for the season? Is it around that time? Why do you think there was such a delay?

Eric: Yeah so, I think what they’re doing now is…they’ve got a very scheduled, and I don’t know the schedule exactly, but there’s a time period when they’re out looking for new companies, there’s a time period when they’re filtering companies, there’s a time period when they’re preparing companies to come film, there’s a time period when they’re filming, and then, I’d assume, there’s a time period when they’re cutting everything up and editing it and producing it, and then there’s the show. So it’s just, there’s a lot of steps involved. They’re going to have 20 seasons, or 20 shows a season, and each season has what? Like, five shows, so you’re looking at like 100 companies that you’ve got to finagle all that together. So there’s a lot in the air, and it made sense to where they’re just…you know, when they’re looking for talent, they’re looking for talent. The rest of the time, they’re focused on everything else.

Jock: So they got back to you in May, and then you aired on the 31st of October ’14. And so, let’s run through the process. They e-mailed you back. What did they say?

Eric: Well, let’s talk about…there’s a few different ways that you can actually get in front of the team at Shark Tank, one of which is, of course, submitting an application like we did. And we only sent one application. We never bothered them. We trusted that they got it, and that if they were interested, they’d come back. They also do casting calls at various cities. I think they had one going on at SXSW, that we thought of going to, but from what I heard from other people, was that that’s when they’re looking for those real gimmicky type of businesses, the ones that they just do for comic relief and they kind of want to laugh you off the stage. And then, of course, the third way is to get an intro…or I guess, get an intro, or they come and they contact you. They have teams out there who are looking for cool businesses and they’ll go out and they’ll contact you directly. So there’s a few different options to get in there. So then we passed on this opportunity at SXSW. It was a couple weeks later that they reached out to us and told us that they wanted to take us through their process. Once you go through that, it’s just a lot more background checks. They want to make sure that you’re not lying about business, that your company is set up the way it’s set up, that someone else doesn’t have a patent for the products you’re selling, just…there’s no legal issue… As they say, they’re in CYA mode so they’re covering their asses and they want to make sure that anyone who gets put on there is going to be a good company. I say “good company,” but would be a non-suable company or company that’d get them sued.

Jock: Sure. So, May, they got back to you. Let’s walk through the process. So what was in that e-mail? What did they say? What did they want?

Eric: With that e-mail it would’ve been just, “Hey, we’re interested in moving forward with your show.” Fill out this more paperwork, sign more details about what your company is. It’s like an 80-page contract. Give you all the ins and outs of what to expect.

Jock: Gotcha. So basically, you’ve been run through their vetting process. You’re going to jump through all the hoops, you’re going to make sure you’re ticking all the boxes, which is basically verify financials and legals, etc…so how long did that process take before they’d done all their background checks and they gave you the green light?

Eric: It moves pretty quickly. Once you get into the system, it’s moving in like a day-to-day or week-to-week type of business. So they have deadlines for you. The deadline to get the contract in was like a week or two weeks. So we passed it along to our lawyer, our legal team, to make sure there was nothing that would really bite us in the ass. Once that gets signed off, then it’s getting all the patent search going…but during this process, they’re also working on your pitch. So they work with you to help optimize your pitch. Then you’ll record it constantly and kind of tweak it and improve it and make sure it really flows well from you and that it’s something they would feel confident putting on air.

Jock: So let’s go to the next date. May, you got the email. When was everything sort of wrapped up in regards to due diligence? What month was that?

Eric: I’m fuzzy between all these dates. I don’t know day-to-day. It took probably about a month to go through the whole background screening, the patent screening, the pitch perfection, and then bringing us out to record. We would move in…that would be, like, I think we recorded in June, that we would go in and record.

Jock: Oh, wow. So it was really fast.

Eric: Yeah, yeah, they put it all together, and I’m scrambling…like, you’re scrambling to build your set and piece it together. You’ve got to put a lot of time and energy into Shark Tank, so that’s the other risk that we always looked at. We could put in tons of energy and a lot of resources into it, and never get on the show. They’re very up front about that as well…there’s never any guarantee that you’re going to get on the show, so the investment that you put into getting on the show, take that in mind. You could pay thousands of dollars and have thousands of dollars of man-hours preparing yourself to be on the show and never get on.

Jock: So, they filmed in June. Is it right that they just film it in five days?

Eric: Yeah. I mean, it may be more days, it may be less days, I don’t know. But they bring in these groups of entrepreneurs, who you can’t talk with, because they want to keep everything confidential and quiet, and then, to be most efficient with the sharks’ times, that makes sense. So they’ll go in and shoot several episodes very close together.

Jock: Let’s talk about the pitch. Where do you have to go to? Who else was there? Was it really structured? Were you scared shitless? All of the above?

Eric: The actual pitch on the show…of course, it’s a TV production studio. I probably can’t give you the specifics of which studio. You arrive there, and when you have your time to be called, you get up and you make sure that your stuff looks the way that it should look, that your presentation for your stuff is all correct, and then they get it all set up, and they get you behind the doors, and your heart beats at like 500 beats per minute, and then they do open up the doors, you walk through it, and you stand on your spot and you start pitching to the sharks. The first time they ever heard about Beardbrand was the minute I walked through those doors. A lot of what they show on TV is real. The intensity is real, not necessarily because it’s just pitching to investors, but because it’s in front of 7 or 8 million people. And then you just go from there.

Jock: They did a little pre-roll for Beardbrand. Did they shoot that after you were in the tank?

Eric: With the pre-roll, yeah. They don’t know how the pitch is going to go, so they’ve got to kind of narrow it down after all the pitches are done and they get a feel for how they want to build their show. Then I think they’ll do the pre-roll from there. We were lucky enough that they selected us. They call them “at-home packages,” where they just kind of tell the story and give a little bit more detail about the entrepreneur or the business and what they’re doing. We were very fortunate to be able to get one of those shows as well.

Jock: How did it feel finding the “X marks the spot” for the TV set and then standing in front of all the sharks?

Eric: If you guys do a little more digging, this is out there as well, but you go in there, and you stand there for about 30 seconds as they get all their cameras set up in a line properly. Then I think…someone indicates that it’s OK to start your pitch. So it’s like this very awkward, quiet moment before you start pitching. It’s intense. It’s a very intense experience.

Jock: Were you surprised at how constructed it was just from the TV show element?

Eric: What do you mean by “constructed?”

Jock: The fact that you had to wait 30 seconds, the fact that they probably had pauses in between to change camera angles and all that good stuff?

Eric: First of all, there weren’t any pauses, so there’s no interruptions once you start going with them. They record everything. They do a really good job of preparing you for what to expect. So there’s no surprises as an entrepreneur. They lay out exactly how everything is going to work, where you’re going to stand, what’s going to happen. There’s no surprises. They also do a really good job of laying the expectations of being on the show and chances. They are, in my opinion, pro-entrepreneur. They’re not out there to screw you or do hit pieces or make you look bad. They’re there to share these stories of entrepreneurs who are out there who are passionate about what they’re doing. When you don’t do it every day, when you’re not a TV personality, I would imagine it’s kind of challenging. I feel like a lot of my YouTube videos almost prepared me for the experience.

Jock: There was a lot of prep that you did regarding the actual pitch. How much help did you get from the Shark Tank team in terms of structure, what you should say, and when you should say it?

Eric: They helped out a lot. My original pitch was immediately going into the numbers and kind of boastful and getting them excited. They had the idea of kind of leave them hanging, give them a little bit of a teaser, and that starts the questions from there. That’s what they want you to do, is start interacting with them.

Jock: Do you want to run through the rough structure that they had you go through?

Eric: It’s pretty basic. You say your name, you say your company, what you’re doing, and what makes you unique, and then what your valuation is. Kind of straight to the point. I would say those are the three core things that you want to knock out with your pitch.

Jock: How long was the actual spiel where you were talking with no interruptions?

Eric: They give you about two minutes

Jock: Really? So it’s like literally like two minutes worth of pitch and then like 43 minutes worth of questions.

Eric: Yeah. Exactly. They don’t really edit out…if you guys go and watch my pitch, they edited out a joke within my pitch. They made it seem like my product was a joke which was the only frustration I had with it. Beyond that, it was pretty much the pitch that you see on TV was my pitch.

Jock: Let’s talk about the questions. How long were you in the tank? About 45 minutes?

Eric: Yeah, time flies when you’re in there. You have no regulation of how long it is. But I think it was about 45 minutes.

Jock: All the questions they ask you don’t obviously see on the show. If you were going to categorize what style of questions you get bombarded with, do you want to sort of have a guess at what they were asking and why?

Eric: If you guys watch the show, the questions they ask are very on point. A lot of it is discovery of what the business is about, how you’re making money, and what the valuation is. Really, if they like you or they don’t like you and if they want to do business with you or they don’t want to do business with you? It’s just truncated down so they filter out the questions. A lot of them will be digging. For instance, they asked me about my numbers, and I broke it up into six-month run rates. Mark had a question if that was total or if that was over the course of the last six months or whatever it was. So there would be clarification e-mails that they were able to truncate based on how those questions were asked. They do do a good job of condensing a lot of information in an appropriate amount of time.

Jock: So the sharks don’t have a pre-list? They don’t have a one-pager at all before they see you? The first time they see you, whether that’s documents or live, is actually when you do the pitch. Is that right?

Eric: Exactly. So they’re not reading up on me, they don’t know anything about my business, my numbers, nothing. It’s just coming in and I’m chatting with them.

Jock: So what was the hardest question? What question stumped you the most?

Eric: I felt like I didn’t really get hung up on a lot of questions. A lot of the things I got were them just not understanding the market or the niche, and then not being able to effectively show them how many men out there currently wear facial hair. A little bit of what they did was they got hung up on our Beardsman kit, which is like our high-end, premium product. And we just brought it out there to kind of show the quality, but really, beard oil is our primary product. They kind of got hung up on the items within the Beardsman kit and I couldn’t get them focused more on the beard oil and our core product. So it wasn’t so much that the questions were hard, but it was wrangling in five fiercely independent and driven individuals. You’ve got to have a lot of controller mentality in there. You’re getting asked by five different people at the exact same time, and being able to know how to pick questions first and how to direct them and guide them so that they’re all moving in the right room. You’ve got to be an excellent person of controlling the conversation.

Jock: Who asked the most questions?

Eric: Kevin was in there for a while asking a bunch of questions. Mark asked some questions really early on, and then Daymond and I…we talked a little bit toward the end. Lori had some remarks, and I felt like Robert wasn’t really into it. I don’t think I got a lot of questions from Robert.

Jock: So you reckon, there’s a relationship between their interest level and the questions that they ask?

Eric: I would think so, and I think they were having fun among themselves as well. They seemed to be in good spirits and jovial so I let them have their banter between themselves as well.

Jock: Tell me about them individually.

Eric: It’s really tough to get to know someone within 45 minutes. In my personal impression, I think Kevin puts on this persona of the shrewd valuation type of guy, likes to lowball. That didn’t bother me at all because I kind of knew he was going to do that. I think that you see on air is pretty accurate with what I interacted with, so it’s hard for me to say that they’re any different or that I really even know them any better than someone who watches the show a lot.

Jock: Did they offer any good advice?

Eric: Yeah, I mean, Mark told me to just focus on beard oil individually and not focus on the Beardsman kit. Kevin told me to get ready to sell a bunch of Beardsman kits. Kind of passing words as I walked out the doors. If they had more advice, I missed it or I didn’t pick it up

Jock: Is Kevin as big of a dick as he’s made out to be on the show?

Eric: I didn’t think he was a dick at all there. I didn’t think he was a dick to me. But then again, I can separate the business aspect from the personal. So I think he was fine to me. He didn’t seem a dick at all.

Jock: Was the only access you got to the sharks on the show? Was there any access afterwards at all

Eric: Well, I did a little digging and I found Mark Cuban’s e-mail, and I shot him a quick e-mail that night just to thank him for his time and what he’s done with the show. He was kind enough to respond and shoot me a quick little message back with encouraging words. I couldn’t find the e-mails for the other team, so I think Daymond’s since favorited one of my Tweets. That was about the closest I’ve gotten to having another conversation with them.

Jock: Cuban’s known to post his e-mail address across the billboard at the Mavericks games so I’m sure it wasn’t that hard to find.

Eric: Yeah, he’s pretty accessible. I don’t know how he can respond to all those e-mails but I’m sure he gets a ton of them.

Jock: He’s a machine, just quietly on a side note, Cuban fan myself. That man’s incredible.

Eric: Yeah, he definitely has a lot of skills that I don’t have, that’s for sure.

Jock: So let’s talk about the deal. You didn’t get an offer. Why do you think there was no offer?

Eric: I think Cuban had a pretty valid reason for not investing. He saw this as being kind of a small market and capping out at $5 million. He only wanted to do bigger deals. I disagree with him, but if that’s what he sees, that’s what he sees. With Lori, she just didn’t understand guys having facial hair, which I thought was kind of odd because there’s definitely a fair amount. Maybe it’s just the markets I do where I see them, but she just didn’t understand the market. I kind of think Robert was maybe along the lines of he just didn’t see the potential in the marketplace. And then Daymond, probably if I’d got Daymond on another day I may have been able to get an offer from him or if maybe people were maybe if it went a little bit different way I think I might have been able to, but he was very down the fence. I thought he was going to go one way or the other. I think our valuation, what we did, we valued our business at like $400,000 for 15%. I would have done up to $400,000 for 20%. But $400,000’s still a lot of money and if nobody else was jumping in, that would’ve been all Daymond’s money. So it’s…I think that’s a lot for him to bite off without having like 100% certainty that he would able to get that back.

Jock: Sure. You know, we’ve had this conversation before, and we both agreed that there’s a correlation between when you’re pitching and at what time of day, and what day that you were pitching and getting a deal done. What day were you filming, and were you the last one or the second to last one of the day

Eric: They do it in phases, and I was at the end of the phase that we were in. I was there for five days. That day, I was also the 10th person to pitch. So I don’t know if they had just done a whole bunch of deals or if they’re tired or what was going on with them, or if they just wanted the day to be over. So there’s a lot of things like that that go into it that…it’s just that the human aspect of business and nature is…you want to get them in good spirits, you want them to…you know, give them some wine or something, get them loosened up a little bit and then deals will get done. So there’s a little bit of luck involved with that as well.

Jock: Do you regret not getting a deal done?

Eric: No, I mean, that wasn’t in my control. I thought going on to the show, I thought I had to prepare for handling multiple offers, because that’s what I thought was going to happen. We had some of the best numbers ever to be on that show and I thought, there’s no way, with the kind of numbers we’re bringing into the table, that they would, wouldn’t they even think of offering us. I was actually a little surprised that we didn’t even get an offer, and we would’ve, if they offered us, we would’ve done a deal.

Jock: If you really did want an offer, would you have changed the structure of the deal terms

Eric: Yeah. We pitched 15% and we would go up to 20% for that same amount, so we would take it down to a $2 million valuation.

Jock: All right, let’s talk about the after-effect. What does Kevin O’Leary call it, “The Shark Tank Effect?”

Eric: Is that what he’s calling it?

Jock: I think it’s “The Shark Tank Effect.” Anyway, I hear them talking about it all the time. The publicity and PR that you get from the show directly correlates to an increase in sales, doesn’t it? Doesn’t matter who you are or what you are, you get a whole bunch of publicity, and so, tell me about the results. I was sitting there eating pizza and we were looking at the traffic. It was pretty good. Do you want to share month before, month after? Lead up to it?

Eric: Yeah, it definitely was a killer experience and tons of exposure. I was very happy to be on it. But at the same time, it’s not ultimately going to make your business. You’ve still got to grow your business and beat the competition and stay above the crowd. It airs on a Friday, and then you’ll have, what you’ll do on Friday is going to be a really good day. What happens on Saturday is usually about the same. We hit it right before the holiday season, which is our peak period as well, so I think we kind of just fell into this whole season of nice performance. Ever since then, we’re on pace to do about 2X or 2.5X what we were doing last year. So it’s definitely been good for exposure but I don’t think all of our growth has been exclusive to the effect of Shark Tank. That’s…while it is, eight minutes or five minutes on national TV, that’s still only five or eight minutes. There’s a hundred and however many alumni of the show and you can’t name them all. So maybe they come up in your mind or maybe when you see something down the road it’s going to help with that, but it’s not going to be something where you get all this traffic and then all of a sudden you’re a billion dollar company. It doesn’t work that way.

Jock: Let’s talk specific numbers in terms of sales on that weekend, so the Friday-Saturday-Sunday, compared to the Friday-Saturday-Sunday before Shark Tank in terms of increases, because it was pretty significant.

Eric: We had like a $40,000 weekend with Shark Tank, and before that, I would imagine we were doing about $7,000 a day. So that would’ve been around a $14,000 or $20,000 weekend before. But I don’t have those numbers exactly in front of me.

Jock: It’s more than doubled. I remember looking at the Analytics data and it certainly did more than double and even that month, the month of November, was probably about double the month of October roughly.

Eric: So the thing is, a lot of your growth is going to depend on your current company size. I feel like we weren’t a small fish when we went on the show compared to a lot of the others. That “Shark Tank Effect,” if you’re only doing $25,000 a year, and then you’ve got this great idea that gets a lot of traction online, then yeah, you could go up and have a $25,000 weekend. But where we sat, we were already a little more established so we were able to handle the demand and our website didn’t go down and we didn’t really run out of inventory and all that stuff. I was expecting the whole world to end. So it all comes down to your perspective of where you’re coming in and where your business currently is at, on how much growth the show has to be. I would think that…I would expect to do an additional, probably $10-15,000 worth of sales more than what you normally do on individual days for the next couple days.

Jock: The growth you’ve seen since the show, could you attribute a certain percentage of sales purely from Shark Tank?

Eric: Maybe we could look at it, let’s see if I can do a quick Analytics and see how many people are searching for “Shark Tank” in the keywords. Maybe get a feel for what those conversions are. With Google Analytics getting rid of the whole…

Jock: SEO data’s a pain.

Eric: It’s not always the best. Let me see here…I’m sure I could do it, but it’s not…

Jock: Give me a gut feel.

Eric: Well, we’re doing 2X what we were doing last year, so I would imagine that a lot of that has to do with the effects of Shark Tank.

Jock: Anything else that you think is prudent to share regarding the process, how to get on it, any tips for anyone who wants to try?

Eric: My big thing would be to really listen to what the team is telling you. So if they’re giving you advice, take advantage of that advice. If they’re…you know, they’ve done this pitch for a lot of people. Don’t build your business around the opportunity of being on the show. It’s going to be…it’s almost like playing the lottery. You’re not going to be able to build your business by playing the lottery. You’ve got to build your business and then if something like this happens, then take advantage of it, but don’t let it be the defining thing that’s going to help you get to the next level.

Jock: Well, man, thank you very much. That was an interesting and fun exercise. If someone wants to reach out to you, if someone wants to buy some awesome beard oil, where should they go?

Eric: Of course our website is beardbrand.com, and if you’ve got any questions for me, Twitter is a great medium for me and that’s @bandholz, which is my last name.

Jock: Man, I’ll see you in Austin, soon. Thank you very much.

Eric: Great! Pleasure’s all mine, Jock.

 

 

 

Filed Under: Blog, Podcast

2015 Valuation Report: Metrics from 182 Business Sales

January 12, 2015 By jock

Digital Exits publishes a yearly online business valuation report that analyses the previous years sales data from BizBuySell.com the leading business for sales classified website. In this data we analyse both for sale by owner and for sale by broker online businesses sold in the 2014 period.

The goal with this report is to give tangible data to both buyers and sellers on the valuation multiples of online businesses.

You can see all past reports here:

  • 2013 Online Business Valuation Report
  • 2010-2012 Online Business Valuation Report

 

Some interesting observations for 2014:

  • Total sales transacted increased $30 million from 2013 data.
  • The total transactions volume double from 2013 to 2014
  • Ecommerce business transaction volume double
  • Software business transaction volume tripled
  • The average multiple decrease dramatically from 2.7 X to 2.06X

We Analyzed 182 Businesses From 6 Business Models

sales by type_TITLE

In total we analysed 182 businesses that were sold between January and December 2014. A few assumptions were made. We only analyzed businesses with a sale price higher than $50,000 and removed any obvious outliers in the data set (for example: a business that sold for $80,000 that was making $7,000 in profit for the last 12 months). We have adopted the following definition for each business model:

  • Advertising – a website monetized through ads or affiliate offers
  • App – a mobile app, monetized through paid downloads, membership or advertising
  • Ecommerce – traditional ecommerce stores, drop-shipping and digital products
  • Lead Generation – websites monetized through selling leads
  • Service – websites monetized through providing a service
  • Software – SAAS (software as a service) and any other application based business

What We Found From Our Analysis

what we found_TITLE

This years data shows a significant drop in the average multiple that an online business sold for (2013 data showed an average multiple of 2.7 where as 2014 showed 2.06). If you look at the data and compare it year to year there is significantly sites that sold in the 1.5 – 2X valuation range I believe this was a major cause for the drop in average valuation multiple. This is reflective in the median and mode being significantly lower in 2014 (Mode is $100,000 in 2013 compared to $60,000 in 2014 and the median is $327,000 in 2013 and $200,000 in 2014). There was also a significantly larger volume of businesses traded in 2014 compared to 2013. I do think this trend will continue in 2015 .

What’s Is The Average Multiple Per Business Model?

multiple per business_TITLE

We analysed a multiple of net earnings (yearly profit) to compare business models. For example if an ecommerce sold for $520k at a multiple of 2.6X, then the yearly profit was $200k. 2014 multiples were significantly lower than 2013.

  • Advertising -In 2013 the average multiple was (2.15) compared to 2014 of (1.87)
  • App – In 2013 the average multiple was (3.85) compared to 2014 of (1.87)
  • Ecommerce -In 2013 the average multiple was (2.77) compared to 2014 of (2.34)
  • Lead Generation -In 2013 the average multiple was (2.0) compared to 2014 of (2.15)
  • Service -In 2013 the average multiple was (2.72) compared to 2014 of (2.32)
  • Software -In 2013 the average multiple was (2.56) compared to 2014 of (2.37)

Multiple Range For Business Size

multiple per sale_TITLE

This data is pretty consistent in our last 3 valuation reports. Larger businesses are commanding a higher valuation than smaller websites. Regarding data in general each sales price range the multiple is down 10-20% consistently from last year which is congruent with the overall 2014 trend.

At What Valuation Did Transaction Occur

price range_TITLE

There was a large amount of transactions that took place in the sub $250,000 valuation range. Specifically a lot of transactions occurred in the $50,000 to $150,000 range:

Some interesting facts:

  • There was more than double the amount of ecommerce transactions (41 in 2013 compared to 96 in 2014)
  • There was triple the amount of software transactions (11 in 2013 compared to 38 in 2014)

 

What Questions Do You Have ?

I hope you got some value from my analysis of what your online business is worth. But I want to hear about how you plan on using this data when selling your business or any questions you have. Don’t be shy: drop a comment below right now and share the love!

 

infografic2015_BW_circles

Filed Under: Blog

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

WANT MORE INFORMATION ON THIS LISTING?

WANT MORE INFORMATION ON THIS LISTING?

  • PEO Companies
  • Blog
  • Archived
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of use
  • Contact